Conference report 1999

   
Main
News
Purpose
Origins
Activities
AfR Financing
International Advisory Council
Steering committee
Adresses
Reference Material
References, Books
Periodicals
Multimedia
Conference Reports
AGENDA FOR RECONCILIATION -
Dialogues towards justice and reconciliation

Chapters of the Report:
- CIVILISATIONS – REPLACING DISTRUST WITH APPRECIATION
- POLITICIANS’ ROUND TABLE

- FROM VICTIM TO HEALER –
THOSE WHO HAVE SUFFERED MOST MAY HAVE MOST TO GIVE

- COMING TO GRIPS WITH CORRUPTION

Yukihisa Fujita, Member of Parliament, Japan
Soon after the United Nations launched its Agendas for Peace and Development, Caux launched the Agenda for Reconciliation. We did so because peace and development depend on reconciliation. In each stage of the peace process, there must be efforts towards reconciliation. The warring parties need to see that people of differing races and religions can learn to work together for the common good. That is the aim of Caux.

Edouard Brunner, former Secretary of State, Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland
There is a great difference between stopping a conflict and reconciling the warring parties. The first is far easier than the second. I know of no political agenda that is dealing with reconciliation. If we can add that dimension to the initiatives aimed at restoring peace, this will be a big step towards creating fraternity and interdependence between people in conflict.
This is the aim of the Agenda for Reconciliation, which brought 480 people from 60 countries to the Moral Re-Armament international conference centre at Caux, Switzerland, in August 1999. This report contains extracts from the proceedings.

CIVILISATIONS – REPLACING DISTRUST WITH APPRECIATION

Will the future will be characterised by the clash of civilisations? Or by the growth of a constructive dialogue between them? The Agenda for Reconciliation witnessed a wide range of cross-cultural dialogues.

Sir Douglas Graham, Minister for Treaty Negotiations, New Zealand
The Maori people came to New Zealand a thousand years ago. Two hundred years ago, British settlers started to arrive. The two peoples signed the Treaty of Waitangi, guaranteeing the rights of the Maori under British sovereignty.
However, as the number of settlers increased, their demand for land increased. Maoris grouped together to try and prevent sales. That was deemed to be a rebellion. Troops were imported, wars began, and Maori land was confiscated. Then we established the native land court to break down communal ownership into individual titles and make land sales easier.

By 1900 the Maori people owned only 5% of the land of New Zealand and were dying out, disheartened. They had no way of seeking redress for their grievances.
In 1975, as a result of Maori protests, we established the Waitangi Tribunal to hear the grievances. By 1990 there were 700 claims. At that point we decided that we would attempt to address all the claims. We were not motivated by guilt, because we were not alive when the wrong was done. But we have an obligation to correct the wrong.
It fell to me as Minister to begin. I started with a blank piece of paper. How do you value losses suffered a hundred years ago?
Well, we've tried. In the last 10 years we have settled claims which cover a little over half of New Zealand. Maori people now own more than half the commercial fishing in New Zealand. It has cost the tax-payer about $700 million so far. The tribal groups have invested these funds, and are able to provide their own education scholarships, their own health care in their own way.

The settlements will not be durable unless the negotiations are fair. So they are unusual negotiations. They are not commercial. They are spiritual. We begin each time with the Karakia, a prayer. We sit around the table, not across. There are a lot of tears. The burden is great on the Maori leaders. But they recognise that to pass on the grievance to the next generation would be unhealthy for Maori and for New Zealand.

The settlements have three parts. The first part is a formal apology from the Crown, which details what happened; and an apology from the Government on behalf of New Zealanders, which we will deliver in person at the Marae. The second part is cultural redress - the return of burial sites, the recognition of interests in rivers and lakes and geothermal power and mountains. We recognise the holistic way that Maori people view those resources and the life force that they see in all of them. Thirdly there is commercial redress, which we hope is enough to get people started again financially.

It has been ten years of hard work. There are moments when you get frustrated and wonder whether it is going to work, and whether you can take the population with you. You have the red necks on one side and the radicals on the other, and you aim for the 80% in between, and say to them, "The vision is there. Your sons, mine, our grandchildren, will live together in greater harmony". You know that you are trying to bring justice for the betterment of New Zealand and hopefully for all mankind.

Recent years have seen a renaissance of Maori culture. Maori elder and educator Kuini Reddy explained how this has come about.
We were fed up that the prisons and welfare institutions were full of Maori people. We realised that we had to return to the values of our ancestors. Maori elders from all over New Zealand came together at a national hui, and decided to focus on the language. Language is the life force of a people. But ours was dying fast after three generations of suppression.
We started at the grassroots, winning the support of our politicians to the Kohango Reo movement, which establishes Maori kindergartens for our children, so that they receive our culture and language from an early age. Through the revival of the language we are able to revive our soul, and this is restoring our culture.

Wilhelm Verwoerd, lecturer in philosophy, South Africa and grandson of former Prime Minister Henrik Verwoerd, widely regarded as the architect of apartheid.

I grew up living the seductive life of a white Afrikaner in the beautiful university town of Stellenbosch. When I went to Europe as a student, I was suddenly exposed to painful truth about South Africa. I had been very proud of my Afrikaner identity; but when a Zambian asked me, ‘Why do you Afrikaners try so hard to separate yourselves from us Africans?’ I saw how much that identity was based on fear. I began to see my grandfather through the eyes and tears of South Africans in exile, and realised the huge difference between their view and the picture with which I grew up.

Later I realised that though I was committed to an equal partnership with my wife, I had to overcome deeply engrained attitudes to sharing the labour of the home, so that we could both be involved in the public life of our country.

When we went back to South Africa, I was like a tree without roots. I had to find a place where I could be anchored again. One day I went down to the beach. Huge waves were coming in. I wanted to run away; but I sat for hours, facing those waves. I realised that I needn’t be ashamed that I am a white Afrikaner Christian, as long as I did something creative with these sources of myself. That led me eventually to join the ANC. My father told me that if I did this, I could not be a member of the family any more. But because I found clarity of conviction, it was possible to make that choice. Reconciliation is a costly business. But it has brought Melanie and I to a point where we can feel alive, excited and privileged to be part of shaping a new South Africa.

Melanie Verwoerd, ANC Member of Parliament, South Africa
Reconciliation does not come cheaply. It is the tortuous road of a life-long commitment to the country and its people. It requires, from each of us, a personal introspection. We need to keep quiet and listen to our fellow South Africans, and recognise the tears of those that have been so deeply hurt. In this process, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission has played an important role. So many have come there to tell their story – not out of revenge, but to seek reconciliation.

Whether those who inflicted the pain intended to do so is irrelevant. The point is that someone was hurt. If that person shares the hurt with you, and you turn your back, this causes further injury. That is why it is crucial for those who were responsible to apologise unconditionally. As Archbishop Tutu said, ‘Confession, forgiveness and reconciliation are not airy-fairy religious things. They are the stuff of practical politics.’

Many people from the previously advantaged communities say: ‘Let bygones be bygones.’ But the reality is that while the vast majority of Africans still live with the consequences of apartheid, whites enjoy the fruits of decades of racially-determined State expenditure. The past is present in access to jobs and earnings, in health care and education, in sport and recreation; and these legacies of apartheid will endure stubbornly unless we actively remove them.

It is therefore important that the Government succeeds in the reconstruction and development programme (RDP) of our nation. And social transformation can not be separated from spiritual transformation. Both Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki have increasingly spoken about the RDP of the soul. They recognise that we must ensure that our history of dehumanisation and immorality does not spawn new generations of people who find nothing wrong with corruption, crime, the mindless pursuit of purely personal goals and profit, and the manipulation of people towards these goals. It is is a battle that we can and must win.
back to top

POLITICIANS’ ROUND TABLE

A group of current and former parliamentarians and senior government officials met during the agenda to discuss conflict situations in several parts of the world. At the end of their sessions, they issued the following appeal:

Ethiopia/Eritrea

We are concerned that events stemming from the Ethiopian/Eritrean war are not given sufficient priority by the international community. We sense the urgency needed in view of potential escalation and the extent of human suffering. We undertake to appeal to our respective governments to take immediate action.

Kosovo and other areas of conflict

We felt that with relation to events in Kosovo and Bosnia the example of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa could play a part in reconciling the deep divisions. Retributive justice is not enough to heal the wounds and ensure a democratic and pluralistic future. We recommend for Kosovo - and other areas of conflict such as Rwanda - that the facilities of Caux be made available to leaders and citizens to begin the processes of reconciliation. We offer to support such dialogue processes.

Debt Relief

There is a strong consensus in support of debt relief for highly indebted poor countries and of conditionality requiring significant reductions in arms purchases by these countries. On a quite separate issue, there is also concern that large sales of gold by certain central banks is causing serious harm to several gold producing countries.

Yusuf Al-Azhari, Former Ambassador, Somalia
Edouard Brunner, Former Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Switzerland
Nidia Diaz, Member of Parliament, El Salvador
Yukihisa Fujita, Member, House of Representatives, Japan
Senator Avel Gordly, Oregon Senate, USA
Sir Douglas Graham, Attorney General, New Zealand
Dr Simi Johnson, Former Cabinet Minister, Nigeria
Hiroshi Kawauchi, Member, House of Representatives, Japan
Kim Tae-Zhee, Former Ambassador, Korea
Anatoly Krassikov, Adviser to Mikhail Men, MP, Russia
Joseph Lagu, Former Vice-President, Sudan
Dr Lao Mong Hay, Director, Khmer Institute for Democracy, Cambodia
Sir Jim Lester, Member of Parliament 1974-1997, United Kingdom
Lin Cho-Shui, Member of Parliament, Democratic Progressive Party, Taiwan
Archie Mackenzie, Former Ambassador, United Kingdom
François Loeb, Member of Parliament, Switzerland
Georges Mesmin, Member of National Assembly 19..-19.., France
Eduardo Molina, Former Member of Parliament, El Salvador
The Duke of Montrose, House of Lords, United Kingdom
Joe Montville, Director of Preventive Diplomacy, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, USA
Hideo Nakajima, Former Director, representing Kazuo Tanikawa MP, Japan
Osman Jama Ali, Former Cabinet Minister, Somalia
Johannes Østtveit, Former Member of Parliament, Norway
Senator Pierre Paupe, Member, Council of State, Switzerland
Anitra Rasmussen, Member, Oregon House of Representatives, USA
Melanie Verwoerd, ANC Member of National Parliament, South Africa
Helmut Wegner, Former Ambassador, Germany
Mammo Wudneh, President, Ethiopian Writers’ Association, Ethiopia
Adrien Zeller, Former Cabinet Minister, Chairman Regional Council of Alsace, France
Zhou Shiqin, Council Member, Chinese Association for Friendship and International Understanding, Beijing
Monsignor Dr. Mato Zovkic, Vicar-General, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzagovina

Several participants in the Round Table spoke publicly at the end of their deliberations.

Nidia Diaz, Member of Parliament, El Salvador. As a guerrilla commander she was a signatory of the Peace Agreement that ended the civil war.

We had civil war for 36 years. The indigenous people, who form 60% of the population, have suffered especially. We have not learnt to respect their right to be different. I am a teacher, and I believe we will only solve this through changing the way we educate our students. I have worked alongside indigenous teachers. They were great colleagues, equal to me yet with differences which enrich our society. My commitment is to work for a new humility among my people. We need the indigenous people's forgiveness, and we need to forgive them. Only when that happens will we unite our country.

The Emir of Kano

In Nigeria, staggering sums have disappeared from Government treasuries, and our society is full of glaring inequalities. There is an endemic sense of helplessness.

The return of democracy to Nigeria is a cause for hope. It is invigorating our powerful press to challenge corruption. The new Government has immediately placed a strong anti-corruption bill before the Federal Parliament. This will strengthen the resolve of the general public.

Nigeria has a mainly Muslim North, and a mainly Christian South. In the recent elections, the Northern electorates asked all political parties to include Christian candidates. Even the Muslim-dominated All People’s Party included a Christian candidate from a southern-based political party. By this arrangement, no-one felt disenfranchised, wherever he lived in the country. This action generated a lot of goodwill.

But corruption and chauvinism remain dangers to Nigeria, as to the world. We need a universal moral rallying point. That, to me, is MRA. There is great strength in the synthesis of man’s struggle to establish a moral order through the divine inspiration of Judaism, Christianity and Islam and through secular ethics. Man’s moral nature will raise him to the lofty heights of humanity if he accepts responsibility; and to debasement if he succumbs to his lower desires.

Kim Tae-Zhee, former Ambassador to Japan, Korea

This year at Caux, people from two parts of China were able to have dialogue. We hope the day will come when South Koreans will meet North Koreans here, and seek peace.

In 1849, the Oregon Territorial Assembly passed legislation excluding African Americans from the State. This year, 150 years later, the Oregon Legislature held a Day of Acknowledgement, when the House and Senate acknowledged this history, recognised people of all races who have worked over the years for positive change, and called for ongoing dialogue and action. ‘On that day, the galleries were packed with 600 people of all ages, dress, colours; and the Speaker invited them to join us on the floor of the House,’ said House of Representatives Member Nitra Rasmussen, an initiator of the Day. Another initiator, Senator Avel Gordly described her feelings. ‘I still find it fearful to stand and speak in the face of lifelong messages that say, you are not worthy, we don’t expect much from you - because you are not white,’ she said. ‘Though there are many people struggling to embrace inclusivity, white supremacy is still the foundation of our American institutions. That is why the Day of Acknowledgement was a powerful statement to our nation.’
back to top

FROM VICTIM TO HEALER – THOSE WHO HAVE SUFFERED MOST MAY HAVE MOST TO GIVE

Vladimir Devakov, Ukraine

Two years ago my wife had a difficult pregnancy. With our free health system crumbling, we decided to pay an experienced doctor to perform the delivery. When the moment came, the doctor was too drunk. We could only rush to the hospital and leave matters to the doctor on duty.

A few weeks later the neuropathologist told us that our daughter had suffered spinal or brain trauma at birth, would not walk until she was four, and would have a serious limp. For us, that started a time of intense pain and fear. We were angry at the doctors, the corruption, our helplessness. We sought compensation, but soon realised that the lawyers only wanted our money.

I tried to be a neutral non-victim, but simply became a passive, quietly angry victim. Here at Caux, people talked about forgiveness. It sounded wonderful. The problem was that I had to be the agent of reconciliation. That was hard. I couldn't do it by myself.

My wife and I saw that this wasn’t just a personal matter. We had to help break the post-Soviet approach to ethics in our country. So we have decided to take five steps. We fervently ask God to remove all bitterness. In my work as a teacher, I am trying to be the best I can be, refusing all bribes. We are doing everything possible to treat our child. My wife is a music graduate; but she has decided to train in nursing instead. And we are supporting the pregnant women we know, helping them get the fruit, vitamins, and other things they need.

In the past days, a great change has happened in my daughter. At the age of 17 months, she has begun to walk.

Yehezkel Landau, Israel

On this side of the Holocaust, the bottom line lesson for most survivors is, 'Never again'. Does that mean just us, or does it mean to be in solidarity with every people anywhere in the face of genocide? Having met Rwandans here, I feel a very strong affinity to them, and I am very grateful for our new relationship.

Since 1948 we Jews in Israel have been tested by political and military empowerment, something we could only dream about for two millenia. The challenge for us is, 'Will our State remain faithful to the primary values of our heritage - justice and compassion?' We have an obsession with security. What are we to choose? The Golden Rule? Or the pre-emptive strike mentality - 'Do unto others before they get a chance to do it worse unto you' - which keeps us trapped in a cycle of violence and retaliation?

I feel that I must apologise to the Palestinians, the Lebanese, the Egyptians, the Syrians, the Jordanians. They are victims of our fear. Our security requires more goodwill and forgiveness, rather than state-of-the-art weapons or policies that humiliate others. Hopefully, with God's help, we can listen compassionately to each other, and work together to heal the wounds of our shared history.

Hamit Gurguri, Kosovo

For a decade we Albanians have endured violence, discrimination, war and many cruelties. I appeal to all my people - do not take revenge. We have a saying: "Braver is he who forgives and reconciles than he who kills." There are Albanians who have reached out in reconciliation to the Serbian people. There are Serbians who have helped Albanians. I believe that we can all work for reconciliation between our peoples. For ten years the University of Kosovo was closed to Albanian students. Now they have returned, and Serbian students have been moved out. I appeal to the Albanian students to invite their Serbian colleagues back so that they can continue their studies together. Let us together build our society in the Balkans.

Didacienne Mukahabe Shiwara, Rwanda

Nurse, trade unionist and human rights activist

After the genocide of 1994, I was traumatised by hate. But God removed it from me. We brought together women of every background to help the prisoners awaiting trial. We collect food, cook it and take it to them. The group has grown until now 75 women are taking part. At first, the prisoners were amazed that widows of genocide were bringing them food. They were scared of being poisoned. But with time, they understood that our motivation was compassion. When they realised that, they started to cry, and to ask forgiveness.

Now I must ask forgiveness. We Rwandans have hated the international community, accusing you of leaving us unassisted when our children were being massacred. Please forgive us.

Helen Moran, Australia

I am a member of the stolen generations of the Australian Aboriginals – children of mixed Aboriginal and European descent who were removed from their families to be assimilated into white Australian society. Acknowledging that we have been victimised is well and good. But I realised that while I viewed myself as a victim, I could not rise above my experiences. They kept me weak, they helped me to stay angry, full of shame, blaming others, mistrusting and resentful. It has been a long and difficult road to recognise myself not as a victim but as a survivor. But I believe that we will not accomplish reconciliation in Australia until the Aboriginal people make peace in our own hearts and with each other. This year I have been a national committee member for the Journey of Healing, which has enlisted tens of thousands of Australians of all races in initiatives aimed at healing the wounds created by the assimilation policies.

Nurta Hagi Hassan, Somalia

In Somalia we have no government, no police, no courts. I live in the capital, Mogadishu, where two factions fought each other fiercely. I belonged to one faction; and lived for revenge against those who killed my people and looted my property. Five years ago I realised that my hatred was victimising myself. Others had suffered more than me. I began to forgive. I decided to go to the women of the other faction, and invite them to set up a market together. The UN helped with a grant which build 50 small kiosks, and we offered 25 of them to each faction. Our aim was not to make money but to bring together those who had been killing each other. Now the market has grown to 150 kiosks, and the kiosk owners have established a kindergarten for all their children together.

At the end of a workshop on Russia, a Czech stood up and challenged the workshop leaders. His father had been killed, he told them, when the Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968. ‘I want to forgive the Russian people,’ he said. ‘But I have never heard anyone apologise.’ Andrei Mironov, (any words to describe him?), responded with a sincere apology, adding that he had served a jail sentence, in part for speaking out against the invasion. The two men shook hands and talked together (pictured above, Mironov on left). The next evening, when the Czechs sang folks songs they ended with the classic Russian song Kalinka, ‘in honour of our Russian friends’.
back to top

Coming to grips with corruption

Sir Jim Lester, former Member of Parliament, UK, and member of Foreign Affairs Select Committee

There was a time when we didn’t talk about corruption. Now it is out in the open. It has forced the resignation of the whole European Commission. The World Bank and IMF have come out fighting. Recently I helped draft a handbook for parliamentarians worldwide detailing methods of creating a clean parliamentary assembly. This year there have been specific workshops in different regions. The IMF have been much braver in not paying loans to countries whose Governments have done little to deal with corruption. In Kenya and Nigeria we have seen amazing change. The OECD has drafted legislation making bribery an offence. In the annual reports of companies, we are seeing much more attention paid to their ‘corporate social responsibilities’ – which usually means their programme to eliminate bribery.

Some people see corruption as a reason not to transfer resources. We should be wary of that argument. Stopping aid does not affect the national leaders. It affects schools and hospitals. We need to try to deal with corruption, but never use it as an excuse to avoid helping countries in need.

Catherine Wanjeri, Kenya
Many Kenyans are unhappy about bad governance. But we lack the moral authority and spiritual strength to work for good governance.

Several years ago, MRA launched a Clean Election Campaign (CEC). Hundreds of thousands of leaflets, outlining the qualities of a good leader, and showing how everyone can help curb corruption, were distributed across the country by churches, mosques and community organisations. A pledge form was attached, enabling the recipient to pledge that they would not participate in corruption or election violence. Nearly 50,000 signed pledges were received by the CEC organising committee.

As a result, corruption became a live issue in the election campaign. Many people refused the bribes which politicians hand out. In some areas people urged women and men of integrity to stand for parliament, and raised money to pay their nomination fees. The new parliament has seen a much more searching debate on issues of corruption.

Since the election, over 7,000 Kenyans have written to the CEC, urging that the momentum be maintained. Thus was born the Clean Kenya Campaign. The first leaflets of the campaign have just come out. Requests are coming in from all over Kenya for campaign launches in their area.

My involvement with CEC challenged me to look at myself. Before I could demand honesty of my leaders, I saw I needed to be honest with my pupils and my colleagues, and straighten out my relationship with my parents and some friends.

Cher Vannath, President of the Centre for Social Development, Cambodia.

Like many countries, we face tragic issues of corruption, such as the traffic in children and in drugs. For five years our Centre has been drafting anti-corruption laws and arranging visits by Government officials to countries where such laws are in place. However, the Government has set aside our legislation. We have concluded that we cannot fight corruption purely through legislation. We are now mobilising the people. We need to give them a vision of a transformed society. To this end, I have been printing and distributing the MRA book, ‘Which Way Cambodia?’ We also need international help, and we are about to become an affiliate of Transparency International. We do not expect quick results. But the more we do, the more we will keep corruption under control.

compiled for AfR by John Bond
back to top

Site search
Links
Initiatives of Change international
Caux Conference Centre
Created © 03
Baroni Interactive
  Page Modification
05-Jun-2003